Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Hafer's avatar

Simple case.

"Artists" have no special privilege.

The University is free to show their work or not, as it pleases.

And to those who make this about the race of the artist, I say that you are the true racists.

But you already know that.

Expand full comment
brensgrrl's avatar

What these students don't realize is that a lot of the so-called art depicting black people in the US are CARICATURES which are not intended to depict any sort of reality about black people at all. Many white artists have been so affected by PAST depictions of black people (such as "blackface" and "minstrel art") and for them and in their eyes, THIS is what black people look like. As a black woman, I believe that everyone is entitled to their opinion, and these murals depict the opinion of a white artist who was clearly influenced by garbage like THIS

https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/news/jimcrow/coon/coon-character-gallery-01.htm

But, the ugly mural SHOULD NOT BE COVERED UP. A BETTER way to protest the downright ugly depictions would be for any student artists on campus to create their own mural depicting the DIGNITY of the black people using the Underground Railroad and insist that THAT mural also be hung, or find dignified art similar to THIS

https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/underground-railroad-mural-study-dolgeville-new-york-post-office-18323

or THIS

https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-underground-railroad/cwGRLw8raEDwOg?hl=en

and get prints or request the original art's temporary display next to the bad art at the college to show the DIGNITY of those assisted by the Underground Railroad AND the dignity of those assisting them. The contrast would make this so-called "art" by Kerson look even worse than it does.

You always fight wrong speech with GOOD SPEECH; and you fight bad art with GOOD ART.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts